Major Online Websites in Singapore to Protest Against Licensing Requirement

MAJOR ONLINE WEBSITES IN SINGAPORE TO PROTEST AGAINST LICENSING REQUIREMENT

The Media Development Authority had, on Tuesday, introduced a “licensing framework” that would require “online news sites” to put up a “performance bond” of $50,000 and “comply within 24 hours to MDA’s directions to remove content that is found to be in breach of content standards”.

As part of the community of websites in Singapore that provide sociopolitical news and analysis to Singaporeans, we are concerned about the impact of the newly-introduced requirement on fellow Singaporeans’ ability to receive diverse news information.

While the S$50,000 performance bond is a drop in the ocean for a mainstream news outlet with an online presence, it would potentially be beyond the means of volunteer run and personal blogging platforms like ours. Hence, MDA’s claim that the licensing regime is intended to equalize the playing field between online and offline news is incorrect: the regulations will disproportionately affect us.

Further, we believe that the introduction of the licensing regime has not gone through the proper and necessary consultation and had been introduced without clear guidance. In a typical public consultation exercise, a government agency will publish a draft regulation with detailed explanation and issue a press release to invite members of the public to send in feedback for consideration. We observe this is not the case for the licensing regime.

ImageWe call on the Ministry of Communications and Information to withdraw the licensing regime. We call upon our elected representatives to oppose the licensing regime.

It is in the interest of Singaporeans and the long-term future for Singapore that the licensing regime be withdrawn.

The new licensing regime has the very real potential to reduce the channels available to Singaporeans to receive news and analysis of the sociopolitical situation in Singapore and it is in the interest of all Singaporeans to guard against the erosion and availability of news channels that Singaporeans should rightfully have access to.

These new regulations significantly impact Singaporeans’ constitutionally protected right to free speech, and they should not be introduced without the most rigorous public debate and discussion.

The new regulations, and the manner in which they have been imposed by regulatory fiat, are unacceptable in any developed democracy.

Leong Sze Hian

http://leongszehian.com/

Andrew Loh

http://publichouse.sg/

Ravi Philemon

http://www.raviphilemon.net/

Kumaran Pillai

http://sgvoize.wordpress.com/

Terry Xu

http://theonlinecitizen.com/

Richard Wan

http://www.tremeritus.com/

Choo Zheng Xi

http://theonlinecitizen.com/

Howard Lee

http://theonlinecitizen.com/

Rachel Zeng

http://rachelzeng.wordpress.com/,

http://singaporeantideathpenaltycampaign.wordpress.com/

Roy Ngerng

http://thehearttruths.com/

Kirsten Han

http://spuddings.net/

Gilbert Goh

http://www.transitioning.org/

Nizam Ismail

http://nizamosaurus.wordpress.com/

Lynn Lee

http://www.lianainfilms.com/

Biddy Low

http://publichouse.sg/

Alex Au

http://yawningbread.wordpress.com/

Martyn See

http://singaporerebel.blogspot.sg/

Howard Lee

http://theonlinecitizen.com/

Elaine Ee

http://publichouse.sg/

Lim Han Thon

http://publichouse.sg/

Joshua Chiang

http://www.facebook.com/joshuafly

Donaldson Tan

http://newasiarepublic.com

Stephanie Chok

http://littlemskaypoh.wordpress.com

Jolovan Wham

http://www.workfairsingapore.wordpress.com

If you would like more information or for media enquires, please contact Howard Lee at
howard@theonlinecitizen.com

Advertisements


Categories: Advocacy

%d bloggers like this: